I’ve become interested recently in history as it is told versus history as it has happened. Obviously, this topic might have popped up in the mind of anyone that watched the opposing viewpoints about Israel’s conduct in the Gaza genocide and the double standard reporting and obnoxious delaying-of-justice and all of that noise.
What’s weird about allowing this slow, double-standard, wishy-washy reporting style is that it reveals the writing-hand of Empire as it conspires in its own favor. Taking this and applying it across history, it casts doubt on any foreign reporting that was done in the name of any prior empire. So the obvious conclusion is that we can’t believe 100% of what was said by the British, French, Portuguese, Spanish, and on and on, especially when it comes to reporting about their own crimes. All of this is standard fare, of course.
My interest narrows down, however, to the Arab Empire. A sprawling thing, it was the dominant force in every aspect of living for a remarkable 600-800 years, depending on where you stop the clock. That’s an incredible amount of time for a lot of things to happen. Putting aside that this history is practically erased from contemporary memory through the deception of the empires that followed, there is yet another more narrow area of development that is of even more interest to me: Religion.
The Arab Empire, in its many forms, was, and in some ways still is, a great beneficiary of its central and incredible location; An economic monster. And one of the primary reasons for its success was Islam. Not because Islam is the be-all-end-all of monotheistic religions (that came later, excuse the blasphemy) but because it set up the best form of taxation and economy that the world had seen up to that point. The economic system was also likely a reason for many people’s conversions. Paying a hefty protectorate fee is not attractive to poor Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians. Paying 2% of your stagnant wealth, however, is practically peanuts. And calling that tax a zakat and assigning it to helping poor people would have certainly proven to be a popular idea if you could put yourself in the shoes of a peasant looking out for themselves.
The majesty of the religion would come later, to be sure. As literacy surely rose and interest in the majesty of Islam spread around, the now-already-Muslims must have become more devout over time. Seeking education, the great academic houses that took Islam as their major source of insight would have cemented further the belief system of the masses that they already attribute themselves as being devoted to. And in that way, you can spread a religion far and wide and place the Noble Quran in the hearts of millions who would become billions. This does not discount the importance, correctness, or essence of the religion. In a way, it confirms that this religion truly is the last and final word in monotheism. It succeeded! God placed a system in our hands that guaranteed the spread of Prophet Muhammad’s message. There might have never been a better way to spread this message. It is telling, to me, that many Arab Christians are generationally wealthy. They must have figured that the protectorate fee was worth maintaining their ability to openly practice their faith in their communities. And compared to the persecution of more traditional branches of Christianity by the Romans during the same period, this likely seemed like the best deal to them.
To be clear, I’m not saying that Islam succeeded because of economy alone. Without a powerful and unifying underlying message, I doubt it would have made it very far. A hallmark of the Pagan period was the mixing of many religions and anyone in those days could start practicing a new school of thought. But where all the religions used to mix, for whatever divine reason, Islam is the one that exploded out of the Arabian peninsula. And once the message had been completed and transmitted, it was up to whoever came next to put in the work, to spread it, and to bring us to where we are today. What I am saying is that in addition to the themes of equality and mercy and the new beautiful imagery, we also had a system of governance that could be easily applied wherever the empire spread to that would reveal the beauty and simplicity of the religion. After all, it takes a very long time to truly learn about and embody the spirit of the sacred text.
But with Empire comes management. And with management comes… Concessions. Adjustments. Fixes. Flourishes. Interpretations. Schools of thought. Areas of study. Expertise. Dogma. And many more of the sorts of seemingly-harmless actions that can build up over time to create a near-unrecognizable beast.
I have heard for many years that Islam is the religion that respects women the most. Okay. Yes. This is correct. The Qur’an, in its majestic language, places women on a pedestal that must be protected and provided for and allowed complete freedom and entitles them to every sort of right that we fight for today. It also mandates the protection of their dignity and to, in no uncertain terms, be extremely gentle with how you treat them.
Is this what we do? You only need a small table of broken-hearted women that will blame a lot of their hardship on the treatment of a man. And that bad treatment comes in many different forms. And is all supposedly justified by sayings of the Prophet. The Prophet who, it needs to be said, did not take another wife until the death of his first. That action alone should be one of the first enshrinements of sunna in the hearts of men. And yet.
Another strange aspect of living, especially moving eastward, is segregation. When in human history has segregation been a benefit to any society? I was most surprised to learn that Arab armies used to travel from battle to battle with their women. A bizarre idea given that this act is unthinkable today. To say that a woman can have a place in war, to make her equal, is unthinkable. But somewhere down the line, all these examples of early Islamic feminism have disappeared, replaced with mandatory clothing, segregation, shame, and an erasure of a woman’s name. Reducing her to Mother of Eldest Man. I don’t want to paint myself as some activist. I just think this is an area of life that is important to consider when we sit and look at the anthologies of thought about what God meant when He said unto us to be modest, for example.
Muslims have always been proud to say that our sacred text is an unchanged sacred text. That is absolutely true. But the anthologies of text around it, I argue, burden it. If I wanted to change something about the Qur’an, I don’t need to change the verse, I’d just need to have a very particular interpretation of that verse. And in that way, a simple and generic command that could apply to the whole world can turn into a strict set of guidelines that dilutes the simple essence of the original command. Be modest becomes don’t show anything beyond your two hands. Those are two very different commands. The words really really matter here.
Islam is a religion for all mankind. But it seems that Arabs are all mankind as they are the only people that can truly stomach the degree of modesty and compromise required to execute the religion in its evolved (?) form.
My favorite new example of something bizarre is that apparently, the Arabic calendar used to have an important feature built into it, which is similar to other lunar calendars: A leap month. An extra lunar month must be added every roughly 32 months to align the lunar months with the seasons. If we did this, Ramadan would always fall within the fall season; A season where the time of day is approximately the same as the time of night. Everywhere. It would be a time of balance for all mankind. And also, during the first four lunar months, the months of animal mating, you should not hunt. They should be allowed to mate and grow their population, especially important in a desert region.
And there’s a historical record here as well. Key battles against the Romans, recorded by both themselves and the Muslims, when calculated against the Hijri dates reported, reveal that Ramadan really did always fall in the Autumn season for the first 10 years of Islam. They reveal that there really was a consistency to be maintained in the lunar calendar. And they reveal that there really is a meaning to every month’s name in the Hijri calendar. I mean how is it possible that Rabi’ 1 and 2 (literally, Spring 1 and 2) could ever fall outside of the Spring season? The Pagans might have been a bit loosey-goosey but they weren’t stupid. They knew that these month’s names had to mean something. And this calendar is only called Hijri because of what it counts from. But the calendar’s features are entirely Arabic. We had been using this exact calendar, leap month included, prior to Islam and leading up to and including the revelation.
So then… What happened? Where did it all go wrong? Was it gradual? Was it immediate? In a time where the world’s conspiracies are turning into truths… in a time where our seemingly endless sea of knowledge can be subject to conjecture, what else have we taken for granted? I guess I’m in a spot now where I’m trying to figure all of this out for myself…
Happy New Year.
References:
Video 1 on the leap month (Arabic)
Video 2 on the leap month (Arabic)
Video 3 on the leap month (Arabic)